—
If there’s one place you’d expect to find support for free expression, it would be among Nobel Prize recipients.
The people who win these awards almost have to be the sort who think big and manage to do so outside the box.
Earning these top awards for chemistry, economics and other areas of human endeavors requires exceptional effort and the ability to examine issues free of outside control.
But I suppose there is an exception to every rule. And one of these is Mo Yan, this year’s recipient of the Nobel in literature.
If you’ve never heard of Mo, that’s not surprising. His work, while widely respected, doesn’t always translate well. And let’s face it: American readers aren’t exactly an adventurous lot.
But the literature prize typically goes to a writer who has proved himself or herself with a body of work. Mo indeed has a lengthy track record in this regard.
Yet Mo’s receipt of the literature prize was a controversial decision, not necessarily because of his writing talents, but rather, because of his beliefs. Appearing in Stockholm last week to accept his award, Mo defended the practice of censorship, something the Chinese government performs with regularity.
In justifying censorship, Mo compared it to airport security checks, unpopular but necessary. However, in comments translated by an interpreter, Mo indicated that censorship should be employed with care, noting, “I also hope that censorship, per se, should have the highest principle."
If those who engage in censorship indeed had principles, Mo might have a point. But the reality is that the power to censor inevitably leads to abuse. The Chinese government, for example, routinely restricts critical comments made about its activities. That’s not principled; that’s a silencing of dissent.
And on that subject, Mo also failed a crucial test for a free thinker. He pointedly refused to support an appeal, signed by 134 other Nobel laureates, calling for his government to release Liu Xiaobo, the 2010 winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. A literary critic and human rights activist, Liu had the audacity to call for an end to single-party rule in China.
Arrested in 2008 on charges of “inciting subversion of state power,” Liu is serving an 11-year prison sentence in China. Is that principled censorship?
When asked about Liu amid calls for his release, Mo tried to duck the issue, saying he had previously expressed the hope that Liu would be released soon. It’s hardly the dramatic stance one would expect from a supposed literary lion.
In his native country, Mo is known for enjoying close relations with the Chinese government. Hence his defense of its actions. Of course, the political winds inevitably change, and one day Mo may find it is his work that’s begin censored.
Under those circumstances, will he be so charitable to the powers that be?
---
Mitchel Olszak is a columnist for the New Castle (Pa.) News.
Opinion
Related Photos
-
g19000000000000000011bd0e1ae31f9d3a7a7ab4da67a1ab381876739a.jpg
COLUMN: Should Nobel winners live up to awards' ideals?
- Opinion
-
-
Imagine there's no football, Barney sounds dire warning
Lem Barney predicted society will do away with football because of the game’s inherent violence, and an increasing awareness of the dangers of head trauma.
-
BBQ My Way: Grilling myths and facts
Some might say fact others would say myth. Here's a list of hotly debated "rules" among those who take barbecuing seriously.
-
EDITORIALS: Military rape cases, High Court on patents
Excerpts: There's no defense to not prosecuting rape victims serving in the military; Supreme Court rules correctly -- and consistently -- in patent cases.
-
Sometimes moms play the role of father, too
What is Father's Day when the father left the family and his children to fend for themselves?
-
Excuses for data sweep sound hollow
some former NSA employees have emerged to say they quit the agency because they objected to the indiscriminate collection of data
-
Where never lark, nor eagle flew
We fast forward 72 years to the present and try to imagine yourself as a former pilot riding in the cockpit of a restored B-17 “Flying Fortress” bomber.
-
EDITORIALS: Farm Bill; DNA patent
Excerpts: There's hope yet, compromise on farm bill may yet happen; Hight Court right to reject DNA patent request
-
Citizens only lose when they OK snooping
It is not just that this kind of “data-mining” has been going on for at least a decade or more. It is that you have also been told it has been going on.
-
What's next? Liberalism is bankrupt
For Obama to admit that once sacred principles are obsolete would be political suicide for a man who fulfilled the promises of the great 20th century liberal causes.
-
NSA data mining? OK, let’s shop
Any citizenry that wraps houses in duct tape and plastic wrap and wets its
pants every time the president raises the security level to orange
couldn’t care less about tapped phone calls. - More Opinion Headlines
-
