Can investors quell gun violence?
(The Free Press – Mankato, Minn.)
While Washington as well as state legislatures contemplate policy responses to the horrific tragedy that left dozens dead in Newtown, Conn., others weren’t waiting. Some major investment houses and pension funds began to speak with their pocketbooks.
Cerebus Capital Management, a private investment firm, announced plans to sell Bushmaster company, the maker of the rifle used in the Newtown shootings. The investment house called the Newtown massacre a “watershed event” that would presumably create new laws restricting those type of guns and change the value of the company.
While the Cerebus decision may indeed not have been an altruistic action but more a financial one, clearly, public sentiment influenced its decision. In announcing the sale, Cerebus said the shooting “raised the national debate on gun control to an unprecedented level.”
We’re thinking that unprecedented level of discussion will go on for some time.
Cerebus invests money for large pension funds and has as one of those investments a company called Freedom Group, the largest firearms maker in the U.S. One of its investors is the California State Teachers Retirement System. The pension fund was reviewing their $600 million investment in Cerebus in response to the shooting, according to a spokesman. The fund would own, through Cerebus, 2.4 percent of Freedom Group.
Cerebus also appeared to be motivated by significant movement in public sentiment for stricter gun laws, ones that would likely outlaw the guns made by the companies that have Cerebus backing. A Freedom Group spokesperson admitted as much saying reinstating the assault weapons ban allowed to expire in 2004 would “have a material adverse effect on our business.”
Even some sporting goods stores are voluntarily taking their assault weapons off the shelves for fear of public and consumer backlash.
Cerebus for its part tried to stay above the political questions, stating: “It is not our role to take positions, or attempt to shape or influence the gun control policy debate. That is the job of our federal and state legislators.”
Whether Cerebus likes it or not, it is influencing the debate.
The power of this kind of corporate democracy may be something investors, teachers, public employees consumers and others might consider adopting, especially since it may likely work toward public policies the people want faster than Washington.
Mental health treatment
(The Joplin, Mo., Globe)
We have yet to learn exactly what mental disorder may have triggered Adam Lanza’s terrible act of violence when he shot 20 children and six adults in Newtown, Conn.
But amidst the speculation, there is agreement that just as we need discussions about the types of weapons and ammunition available for sale, we also need to talk about the treatment of mental illness in this country.
We agree with U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., an avid hunter and a lifelong member of the National Rifle Association who advocates for an honest discussion about reasonable restrictions on guns.
“This is bigger than just about guns,” he said in a news conference. “It’s about how we treat people with mental illness, how we intervene, how we get them the care they need, how we protect our schools. It’s just so sad.”
Just about every mass killing in recent decades in America has been caused by someone who we later learn was mentally ill.
The overall issue of violence in America is far more complex than simply control of firearms.
We as a nation should be able to provide effective care for the mentally ill. Unfortunately, too often their plight is handled through law enforcement, the courts and our jail system.
President Barack Obama has said he will meet with law enforcement officials and mental health professions in coming weeks.
It’s going to take a comprehensive approach to understand the root cause of mass killings like we saw last week.
Can investors quell gun violence?
Warren's populist pitch on student loans is off key
Sen. Elizabeth Warren's populist rhetoric pumps up students about their loan burdens, but she conveniently neglects to mention the real problem - the exorbitant cost of college - much less how she's benefitted from those high prices.
Obama's equal pay exaggeration leads us all into danger
The president's claims of national shame over gender-based pay inequity spring from distorted calculations, as well as some convenient political math.
Voters beware of oligarchs and bogeymen
Scaring voters to distract them from issues is a tired - and bipartisan - ploy sure to be in heavy rotation this campaign season.
Put teens to work by laying off minimum wage rhetoric
Idle teen workers may be a national problem, but frugal private employers aren't the reason for it. Minimum wage hikes - like the one championed by President Obama - squeeze these marginal jobs out of the economy.
Legal marijuana can be government's new cash crop
Officials holding out against legalized marijuana may "evolve" their thinking because of one number: Colorado says it gathered $2 million in taxes from pot shops in January, as business was just getting started.
Banning a 'B-word' teaches girls the wrong lesson
Striking the word "bossy" from the language doesn't help young girls learn to speak up or become leaders. It teaches them how to be, well, bossy.
Giving businesses choice is not legalizing discrimination
The owner of a California gay bar should be allowed to refuse service to legislators he considers "crazy, ignorant or stupid." The problem is the popular double-standard that supports his version of "discrimination" while raging against anyone who disagrees with him but wants the same freedom.
Obama twists Constitution to cut U.S. military
President Obama's plan to slash the military to pre-World War II levels endangers the country, especially when our enemies don't know the war is over.
Benefits of hiking minimum wage are an illusion
The president's latest economic fantasy says raising the minimum wage will incentivize work, lower unemployment, juice the economy and may even lower taxes. All while businesses swallow billions of dollars more in labor costs.
Coastal residents should pay true cost of flood insurance
The environmental champions in Congress took a big break from their moral scolding this past month with a gigantic “Never mind!” after their constituents discovered the law requiring them to start paying the true cost of living in flood-prone areas.
- More Opinion Headlines
- Warren's populist pitch on student loans is off key