CNHI News Service


December 7, 2012

COLUMN: If it's not a recession, then what is it?

Editor's Note: If you're not a weekly subscriber to Taylor Armerding's column, you can publish this one if you notify him at

One of the supposed risks of the Washington crisis of the moment – falling off the “fiscal cliff” on Jan. 1 – is that the automatic tax increases and spending cuts it would trigger will plunge the nation into another recession.

Another? I’m still wondering when the first one is going to end.

Yes, it has officially been over for several years now. But if George W. Bush had been running for re-election this past fall, he would have been mocked on every front page and from every mainstream television anchor chair if he had suggested that 8 percent unemployment meant the country was out of recession.

And interestingly (but not surprisingly) enough, now that President Obama is safely re-elected, even those supposedly mainstream outlets seem to be a bit more willing to report that things are not so good.

Indeed, if this is what a recovery looks like, we need to change the definition. The economy is “growing,” barely, but not fast enough even to keep up with the number of people entering the labor force.

Here are a few other examples:

We heard from Obama during the endless presidential campaign that one of the reasons to re-elect him was that the economy was moving in the right direction, thanks to “the policies we’ve put in place.”

He said electing Republican Mitt Romney would take us “right back to the policies that got us in this mess in the first place.”

But now, one of the concerns of the administration (and state officials around the country) about the fiscal cliff is that it would end the current 99 weeks of unemployment, supposedly put in place to help people hit by the “worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.”

If the recession is really over, why is there even any discussion about letting people continue to collect for nearly two years? Why isn’t 26 weeks (30 in some cases) more than enough?

Because, no matter what the official description of the economy is, we’re still in a recession – a recession that Obama can no longer keep blaming on somebody else. Real unemployment is at least several points greater than the official number.

Here’s another: That shell of what used to be called the greatest newspaper in the world, the New York Times, just announced that it needs to cut another 30 people from its newsroom.

Executive editor Jill Abramson wrote in a letter to the paper’s staff that, “I hope the needed savings can be achieved through voluntary buyouts, but if not, I will be forced to go to layoffs …”

The reason? Even though the Times – a constant Obama cheerleader – is making millions more in digital subscriptions, its advertising remains in freefall. Do you think in a truly growing economy it would be having that problem?

Elsewhere, the promise of a glorious future of green energy jobs remains just a promise – a fading promise. It is not just Solyndra, the most high-profile case of a solar company going bankrupt even after an injection of about a half-billion dollars in federal support.

Signet Solar, another California firm, just filed for bankruptcy after ceasing operations more than two years ago.

In October, two Massachusetts clean energy companies – solar equipment manufacturer Satcon Technology Corp. and battery maker A123 Systems – filed for bankruptcy protection. Satcon had laid off 140 employees in January, and had defaulted on $16 million in debt.

Citigroup just announced it will eliminate 11,000 jobs. Good thing they’re one of those evil, big corporations, and nobody will get hurt because, you know, corporations aren’t people.

Of course, government is hurting too. Now that Obama has been re-elected, flaming liberals have suddenly discovered that raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires is not going to be enough to feed the endlessly “compassionate” beast.

Columnist Farah Stockman wrote this past week that a tax-guru friend had explained to her that hitting the top 2 percent was not going to be enough.

“There’s a problem,” he told her. “Most of the money in the country is still, thankfully, in the hands of the people making between $100,000 and $300,000.”

Howard Dean, former Vermont governor, presidential candidate and Democratic National Committee chairman, went even further on MSNBC this week, saying, “everybody needs to pay more taxes, not just the rich … we’re not going to get out of this deficit problem unless we raise taxes across the board.”

Who knew? You would never know from listening to the smartest president in history. And I wonder why Dean never said anything like that prior to Nov. 6.

So, all you people making less than $250,000 who remember the president’s multiple promises that your taxes won’t be going up “by a single dime,” get ready to be demonized along with the mega-rich for not “paying your fair share” and not “playing by the same rules.”

Just don’t say you weren’t warned. Conservatives have been saying this for years.

Finally, while Obama’s buddy, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, never tires of talking about how his state is “leading the nation” in economic health, all that robust activity is apparently not generating the level of taxes his experts predicted.

The state has a $540 million budget hole, and there is now talk of raising taxes (again) and raiding the rainy day fund again.

Gee, why tap the rainy day fund if we’re not in a recession?


Taylor Armerding is an independent columnist. Contact him at

Text Only
  • taylor.armerding.jpg Warren's populist pitch on student loans is off key

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren's populist rhetoric pumps up students about their loan burdens, but she conveniently neglects to mention the real problem - the exorbitant cost of college - much less how she's benefitted from those high prices.

    April 18, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Obama's equal pay exaggeration leads us all into danger

    The president's claims of national shame over gender-based pay inequity spring from distorted calculations, as well as some convenient political math.

    April 11, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Voters beware of oligarchs and bogeymen

    Scaring voters to distract them from issues is a tired - and bipartisan - ploy sure to be in heavy rotation this campaign season.

    April 4, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Put teens to work by laying off minimum wage rhetoric

    Idle teen workers may be a national problem, but frugal private employers aren't the reason for it. Minimum wage hikes - like the one championed by President Obama - squeeze these marginal jobs out of the economy.

    March 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Legal marijuana can be government's new cash crop

    Officials holding out against legalized marijuana may "evolve" their thinking because of one number: Colorado says it gathered $2 million in taxes from pot shops in January, as business was just getting started.

    March 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Banning a 'B-word' teaches girls the wrong lesson

    Striking the word "bossy" from the language doesn't help young girls learn to speak up or become leaders. It teaches them how to be, well, bossy.

    March 14, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Giving businesses choice is not legalizing discrimination

    The owner of a California gay bar should be allowed to refuse service to legislators he considers "crazy, ignorant or stupid." The problem is the popular double-standard that supports his version of "discrimination" while raging against anyone who disagrees with him but wants the same freedom.

    March 7, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Obama twists Constitution to cut U.S. military

    President Obama's plan to slash the military to pre-World War II levels endangers the country, especially when our enemies don't know the war is over.

    February 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Benefits of hiking minimum wage are an illusion

    The president's latest economic fantasy says raising the minimum wage will incentivize work, lower unemployment, juice the economy and may even lower taxes. All while businesses swallow billions of dollars more in labor costs.

    February 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Coastal residents should pay true cost of flood insurance

    The environmental champions in Congress took a big break from their moral scolding this past month with a gigantic “Never mind!” after their constituents discovered the law requiring them to start paying the true cost of living in flood-prone areas.

    February 14, 2014 1 Photo